In order to resolve emotions, one must identify and name then first. According to John M. Gottman, in his article “Putting Feelings Into Words,” it is necessary to verbalize feelings in order to harness them. It is also beneficial to express specific feelings in relationships. By naming our feelings, we begin to understand them. Emotions are not only a part of our close relationships; they have also been a part of this class. As Steph says in this lecture, “Emotions about the structure and process of this class have definitely been experienced, and some of them have even been expressed.” Our project highlights the ways four distinct emotions have been expressed successfully in our class, as well as in the Group Dynamics class. MemphisBurns chose relief, Masr27 chose confusion, tennisfan816 chose empathy, and jaggerbunny chose frustration. The most important thing our group hopes the audience takes from our project is the idea that there is nothing wrong with being open about your emotions. In fact, it is harmful to yourself and others to hide them. Understanding and expressing your own emotions is a key part of being a successful communicator.
http://tennisfan816.wordpress.com/
http://MemphisBurns.wordpress.com/
http://jaggerbunny.wordpress.com/
Relief
http://MemphisBurns.wordpress.com/
Identifying emotions is crucial to the facilitation and progression of communication. Jaggerbunny expresses it well in her post,Identifying Emotions, “Identifying one’s emotions is a necessary part of succeeding as a human being.” This holds truer with some emotions than others, but is certainly true for all. Addressing and expressing the emotion of relief, specifically, can be of great use in interpersonal communication. The expression of relief can bring with it a number of ’sister’ emotions like appreciation and joy, that can only facilitate the response of others. This encourages “nexting” and the natural progression of communication through the acknowledgment and response to something presented.
In Jaggerbunny’s blog, Be nice to your waitress!
, she describes being a server at a number of different restaurants and the difficulties and stresses that come along with that line of work. She then expresses relief at being at new restaurant with management more to her liking, “The restaurant that I have just started training at seems like a great place so far. Obviously there are the same issues with customers that occur at any restaurant, but the management at this restaurant is extremely laid-back.” She continues to add that servers without duties to attend to are allowed to sit during shifts, which is a welcome change from everything else she’s experienced. The expression of relief led to copious responses from classmates. Tennisfan816 was the first to comment on the post, “My advice is “to hang in there and don’t let the customers get to you, sometimes people just have bad days.” Her expression of relief led to peer encouragement and support in her new endeavor. It led to sympathy from Commsyr09 in the next comment, “I totally sympathize with you on the difficulties of waitressing. Although I have never personally waitressed…” Masr27 said, “I’ve always had a certain empathy for the waiters and waitresses working at the restaurants I eat at…” in his comment. An initial expression of sympathy and a comparable expression of empathy from two different classmates I feel was a contributory factor in our placement in a group together.
Also contained in Jaggerbunny’s post, Identifying Emotions, is another key point, “It is difficult to resolve an emotion without knowing what it is. It is also important to name your emotions in order to effectively communicate with others.” Many times a title, or even a description, of an emotion can connect you with an “other”. I was intensely worried during a number of reading assignments Steph had posted for us to complete when I turned to my peers in the discussion section of our class blackboard. Gym(nasium), ShinyGinger, and CommSyr had all expressed the same concern I had. Steph had taken precautions to make sure that none of us would have to worry about submitting a ‘reading’ assignment, but many of us were worried we were being docked points. Initially, I was relieved to see that I was not alone in my concern over being graded. I was relieved yet again when Steph replied to all of us an assured us we were doing fine. I was not alone in my relief either. The relief was expressed by ShinyGinger in terms of thanks, “Thanks for letting us know.” This displays how relief can manifest itself in terms of appreciation for aid.
Relief is, in many ways, an emotion that is expressed in finite terms. It happens on an individual basis or as a collective, but exists without being constant. The practical section of our brain usually proceeds to progress after the fact soon after being relieved. This made locating examples in Group Dynamics class very challenging. We are relatively familiar with the members of our own class, and have much more access to those conversations than we do to those of the Group dynamics class. In that class, students were trying to put together a project, much like our class, and the time came to make a decision on what the Wiki-page they were creating would contain. In responses to Steph’s post, getting to gist, from February 23rd, students from Group Dynamics class described their experience of picking a topic. Speculative optimism was expressed by ch0c0latemilk when she said this in comment four on that post, “I can only assume and hope that the chaos will soon subside, and that we will begin to move forward as a class and become a more organized group.” Bradytomoss ‘inhaled’ her comment and responded by ‘exhaling’ with optimistic relief to parallel her sentiment. In the seventh comment on that post he says, “I do think that although last class it seemed as if not much got done…that towards the end certain people began to take on leadership roles to facilitate the process. I think we are consistently making strides and I am eager to see where today’s class will go.” He expresses an element of relief once some progress had been made as a group. Steph had applied pressure to the class to motivate each other and make headway, and the class responded by getting the wheels rolling. A few people stepped up to get things going, and the dominoes fell down into place.
In the post, Can we articulate the frame(s) emergent in our interaction?, I noticed something interesting. There were a number of students expressing initial relief, and then skepticism upon second glance. Steph had recently explained to Group Dynamics that there was “now more going on in the talk of our class that I can track alone.” Freshkicks6 explained, “For our homework I had just finished writing a post about how I think we are all starting to get on the same page with the course Wiki page. Now as I write this response, I am starting to feel like I’m missing something.” Just as in our Interpersonal Communication course, once the early jitters and butterflies of figuring out logistics in the course were surpassed, a wave of relief and comfort washed over the majority of the class. This is followed by some general apprehension at the lack of progress and details that unfold about the project in the following days. Initial relief can be turned into apprehension without a proper dialogic process. In some of Steph’s feedback on my work, she suggests this is a key point to remember of interpersonal communication. Group relations is an extremely dynamic aspect of interpersonal communication, and requires effort and patience on all sides to maximize results. If we do not remain attentive to our peers’ emotions and utilize them when formulating responses, or ‘nexting’, we stand to be stuck in a eternal “limbo” of apprehension and never move into an environment of relief and productivity.
Confusion
http://Masr27.wordpress.com/
As a group, we have chosen our project to be on “identifying emotions”, and each of our team members have been assigned a specific emotion, and to gather examples from the course and analyze them. I picked the emotion: confusion, simply because its one that I experienced throughout the majority of the class in several different instances. What is important to understand here is that I thought I knew what was going on, but in reality I was confused, and there was a clear lack of identifying this. Janet posted in our team 5 discussion “I hope I did this assignment right! I have a feeling I didn’t…” personally, this let me know that by her identifying the fact that she was confused, that it was also alright for me to be confused (which I was). Another clear reference as the confusion that was occurring was said by said by Chelsea “Hey guys, I don’t know if anyone will see this post, but if you do we should get started on picking a topic.” When Chelsea said, “…I don’t know if anyone will see this post…” this is an indication or an identifying phrase that lets us know she is confused, by one or possibly several different things occurring. All of this occurring in the topic selection for team 5. All of the confusion that was happening was within our group, and I for one personally wondered if this was just as a result of lack of group effort, of individual effort, or just general confusion as to what was occurring. As it turned out to be, we weren’t the only group to be confused as to what our project actually was, who were our team members, what was required of us, and so on. Then I looked through posts about specific assignments, such as 7.2, and class members were confused as to what was being asked. I opened up the logistics discussion for unit 4 and I found the subject of one of the posts called “VERY confused” by Anne Ostaszewki. She discussed about how she was confused on what she was to supposed to be writing about in general, on all her assignments, saying “I cannot seem to figure out what exactly it is you want us to write about,” a post was followed up about an hour later by Patrick Green saying “I’m just as confused…” This was followed up by Stephanie’s response suggesting using nexting skills we previously learned about. After reading posts upon posts of logistical questions, and general questions about the class almost half way into it, I realized it was definitely not only our team that had been confused, but also several other people were experiencing what we were. By others identifying their emotions, in this case, confusion, it seemed to have alleviated our anxiety as to whether or not it was ok for us to be confused as well, which was certainly a plus. As far as the group dynamics, there is a complete lecture entitled “when confusion is the condition.” The first sentence What remains….from the beginning until now? Students seem attached to “confusion,” even though most of them say the results are positive: increased comfort and familiarity with each other than occurs in other classes. “ This gives me the impression that our specific class isn’t the only one which was experiencing confusion, and the second half of the quote said by Stephanie, sounds exactly like our specific group as well. I do believe we all feel comfortable with each other, and we are somewhat familiar, but we still remain confused a lot of the time. Another interesting point brought up was by freshkicks6 who said “…learning how to organize our ideas and opinions. I think that this is greatly emphasized in every class. We are put into confusing situations sometimes, and instead of just thinking about how confusing it is, or what the solution is. We think about the process in coming to a conclusion, and how to organize and write about this process. We don’t just try to find an answer, we also analyze how to find an answer, while organizing these ideas into something coherent…” That is a very interesting point of view, and they are absolutely correct, we are constantly put into confusing situations, and we must learn how to solve the confusion. Finally, Summer22 said something that struck a chord in me, “it’s ok to question things and be confused,” which brings me back to the identification of this specific emotion, and what happens a result. When (in general) an emotion is identified, things can only get easier from there.
Empathy
http://tennisfan816.wordpress.com/
When we listen to other people talk, we find ways to relate to them such as understanding their situation, thoughts and feelings. By doing this, we are being empathic. In this class, we have been doing that by responding to blog entries. For example, in my first post about learning to write in Thai, saboy82 responded to my post for an earlier assignment and said that, “I can understand what you are going through. Growing up as an Indian in South Africa was not easy to learn about my culture” (http://tennisfan816.wordpress.com/2008/07/15/sawatdee/#comments). Another example of empathy is when we had to write an analysis involving other people’s summaries for 2.2. Thomas Ortiz’s analysis stated, “Stereotyping is similar because it groups people according to qualities that they are believed to share. We all do these unconsciously in our everyday lives. Chelsea Reilly and Janet Yang’s examples are unfortunately very much common. I share their experience in my life. I have grouped people just because of their race, and because I am Hispanic I have been stereotyped against as well” (https://learning.umassonline.net/webct/urw/lc823961418111.tp1158815714051/newMessageThread.dowebct?discussionaction=viewMessage&messageid=1291478020011&topicid=1291159206101&refreshPage=false&sourcePage=). This statement tries to show that a lot of us can relate and understand each other, but we have to be willing to share our experiences in order for this to happen. Another example of empathy is the discussion about Look Me in the Eye. Not only did people express empathy with the author of the book, but also expressed it among their classmates. For example, Chelsea discussed how she can relate to Gym411 because “like him, I would be more likely to do the extra work and say nothing, rather than confront my group members” (http://aplaceinspace.wordpress.com/2008/07/31/continuing-to-converse/#comment-1298). There has been a lot of discussion as to how this whole project would work out and it seems many people can relate to the fact that they want to maintain a good relationship with their teammates to avoid any drama during this project.
In a group project, there is going to be some kind of tension no matter what. It is important to be able to communicate frustrations in order to progress. In one entry about a group project, Sedona1 says, “I have a lot of hope for our group. I feel as though the struggle and frustration that we have gone through is now serving us as a catalyst for progress into the 3rd stage, and cementing us there. I can attest from personal experience that my own frustration and impatience has been bubbling steadily in the weeks to the point where I now feel motivated to take action even if just for the mere purpose of relieving this festering impatience arising from the Storming stage” (http://aplaceinspace.wordpress.com/2008/04/01/emergence-of-care-as-a-group-norm/#comment-967). Although this person is having problems within their group, but they know that by having patience and understanding that members of their group are probably feeling his or her frustration. Being able to accept that other people’s feelings are equivalent to yours can help prevent animosity within the group. In the same post, samesies20 “completely agree[s] with the post from sedona 1. The class seems to have left the “storming” stage and is beginning to enter into the functional relationship stage” (http://aplaceinspace.wordpress.com/2008/04/01/emergence-of-care-as-a-group-norm/#comment-976). It seems that the consensus is that their class was not going the way they wanted, but is finally working out for the better. I think it shows that sometimes when you’re frustrated, you’re not the only person and you should be able to voice your opinion if no one else is willing to acknowledge the problem. Empathy I think makes people feel like they are not alone when it comes to how they feel about certain situations. Even after what seems to be a group emergence, there still seems to be confusion within the class. According to ch0c0late milk, “I too agree with my fellow classmates. “Ambiguity” is the perfect word for this class. (Thanks ehanft). It is apparent, through the posts of other students and my own feelings, that the confusion has remained since the beginning. I personally have become slightly more confused as the class has progressed.” Sometimes people aren’t willing to speak if they feel that they are the only ones who are confused about something. However, by speaking out, you get to learn that some people do feel the way you do. Empathy helps us to accept our feelings as being valid.
Frustration
http://jaggerbunny.wordpress.com/
EXAMPLE # 1
When we began the class, many of us had trouble posting in the proper threads. Steph continued to remind us that we needed to be mindful of the correct places to post. The messages started out as gentle reminders; some even included a smiley face like her post “Why is this a new message instead of a reply?” from UD2.1 on July 17, 2008.
“Please, we will get too scattered if everyone opens new messages on the same topics.
If you (any of you) are responding to a subject that is already under discussion, please REPLY appropriately instead of starting something brand new! If, in fact, you ARE starting something new (!) – go for it.
“
This message is very polite and encouraging. However, immediately after this message was posted, Brian posted outside of his correct thread. Steph experienced frustration at this, having just outlined the rules for posting. The title of her subsequent post was “don’t stress me out!” (UD 2.1, July 17, 2008.) Steph is identifying her emotion as “stress,” which is very similar to frustration.
“Brian – and everyone,
I have just gone through and tried to “correct” this problem. It is possible that we “missed” each other timing-wise – you read all the messages and then posted this here, so I’m going to cut you slack this time BUT
IN THE FUTURE, I will start penalizing for nonconformity to the New Message-Reply Rules!”
Steph realized that she was frustrated with the class, and expressed this emotion. Because Steph displayed her frustration, and began to penalize us for our errors, we learned to use the discussion tool properly. If Steph had continued to prod us gently, it would have taken longer for us to learn the system, and her frustration would have continued. Steph nexted very deliberately in order to effectively steer the class in a certain direction.
EXAMPLE # 2
Technology has been a major part of this class, and I’m sure we have all experienced frustration at different points. In order for this emotion to be resolved, the frustration must be expressed. Usually, in order for our frustration to be alleviated, Steph was the one we needed to vent our frustration to. This next post was made by Mary Vilbon in the “Identities” thread on August 10, 2008. It is entitled “wHat?” (Her frustration seems to be evident in her choice of title as well.)
“Steph,
I know this may be sooo simple to the rest of the class and you but I am so frustrated with the technology I have to follow just to communicate!”
Mary clearly states that she is frustrated in order to obtain help from Steph. Because she identifies and expresses her emotion, Steph is able to help her. She responds to Mary in her post “Blogrolling! (and info on Unit 9)” in “Identities” on August 10, 2008. She explains in detail how to get to everyone’s weblogs. Presumably, Mary no longer experienced any frustration surrounding this issue.
EXAMPLE # 3
Sasha Bohan expresses the frustration she felt when there was conflict between the members of her sorority, and their elder advisors in her post “Was that Communication?” in “Bohm: On Communication. (July 23, 2008.)
“I pointed out how wrong and detrimental it was when my fellow peers were hostile towards their elder advisors. I was frustrated with the lack of communication among the different age groups, and was forced to take charge to save the meetings.”
During this communication fiasco that Sasha experienced, she realized she was frustrated. Because she knew she was frustrated, she was able to do something to fix it. She took charge of the situation, and saved the meetings. If she did not name her emotion, she may have been confused about how she was feeling. This confusion would have caused her to sit back while the hostility continued, instead of allowing her to fix it. Her expression and understanding of her own frustration ended up being beneficial to the entire group. This is also relevant to Karen Zediker and John Stewart’s article, “Dialogue’s Basic Tension.” Sasha assessed the situation, letting the other happen to her. She then held her own ground, and stood up for her convictions.
Example # 4
In this post, Steph acknowledges the frustration of the class, who presumably expressed their frustration directly. She writes that SHE is frustrated as well. At first she believes that her frustration is caused by one single conversation.
“The frustration felt by most members of class was significant and obvious. (I hesitate to say everyone felt frustrated, but it is possible.) I expressed my own frustration in one particular direction (against the “discourse” that first gained prominence and hence seemed to presume inevitability)… it took me reading the results of Test Six to realize my attention was focused only on the most visible or obvious evidence of a deeper matter.
…No wonder I felt like pulling my hair out!”
However, as she continues to consider her emotion, she realizes it is caused by a deeper matter. Because she recognized the importance of her initial emotion, she goes on to discover what is actually bothering her. She ends her post by exclaiming, “No wonder I felt like pulling my hair out!” Her expression of frustration is important because it allows the class to see what needs to be done in the future. It is important to her as a person, because it allows her to “vent.”
EXAMPLE # 5
Summer22 has an interesting outlook on frustration in her class. She is not speaking about her own frustration, but the expression of frustration in general.
“I often notice that within our group members “react and will generally attack the designated leadership (facilitators), as well as any emerging leaders within the group. Many times frustration is aimed at Steph when she introduces new concepts or does not give the group as much information as they are used to. After reading Weber’s piece, I realize that this sort of “attack” reaction is a pertinent part of a group’s growth and development. I feel as if our class as a whole is struggling through the “storming” stage, maybe because we don’t know each other well enough yet (there are lots of people in our class). I suggest that our unfamiliarity with one another is preventing the development of our group because of my experiences in smaller groups within the larger class.”
Summer22 sees the expression of frustration as an “attack reaction.” Steph is sometimes attacked when introducing new topics, just because students don’t understand. This is a common pattern. People become confused, and express their frustration at the situation in an “attack” manner. Summer22 explains that this frustration-caused “attack reaction” is actually useful in resolving the situation. She explains that it is “a pertinent part of a group’s growth and development.” Though the word “attack” is almost always seen in a negative light, it can actually lead to a quicker understanding of one’s conflicted feelings.
EXAMPLE # 6
This next post is the most blatant expression of frustration I have seen in this class. Though she does not once use the word “frustrated” it is clear that Princess3 is frustrated, KNOWS she is frustrated, and wants everyone else to know she is frustrated. Her punctuation, with some words in all CAPS, and double question marks, accentuates her frustration.
“I completely agree with what Aligirl said in her post. I don’t understand why it took until last week for the people who are opposed to the idea to speak up. We do not have an unlimited amount of time to do this project. I was all for alternate ideas, but how do you expect to be taken serious when you don’t open your mouth until week 6?? Also I have a problem with the people in class who keep asking the question, “Well whats going to happen to the site after this class ends?” Im sorry but WHO CARES? Our job in this class and a lot of what we are graded on is creating the site. Not what happens to the site in August 2011. Also to the people who are saying things like, “Well who is going to look at our site?” Again, why bring up a question like that? You are only adding problems to the assignment. We are not being graded on how many people we recruit to look at our site, just what the site looks like in May 2008. Thats it. The current topic at hand is not difficult, it involves zero traveling and little to no research. Again, if a new topic comes up tomorrow and majority of the class likes it, then great we can go with that. My main point is, the assignment is what it is, so stop asking questions that are just going to create problems and/or make the assignment harder.”
Though her post may seem unnecessarily angry, it will definitely make people take notice. Her agenda is to make her classmates understand their immediate goal. A lot of people had been asking questions that were not necessarily relevant to the final goal, even if the answers may have been interesting to them. Princess vents her frustration in the most obvious of terms, similar to the “attack reaction” from Example 5. Robert Alberti and Michael Emmons may see her post as being more aggressive than assertive. In their article, “What it Means to be Assertive,” they give some examples of aggressive behavior. Princess is choosing for others, instead of choosing for herself, which would be considered aggressive. However, expressing her frustration probably made her feel much better, and allowed others to understand her concerns. Her post is impossible to be ignored.
August 18, 2008 at 10:48 pm
In the introduction to their team’s project, Jaggerbunny states that “Understanding and expressing your own emotions is a key part of being a successful communicator.” The expression of emotion is also important in having fierce conversations, as described in Susan Scott’s article “Fierce Conversations.” They also say that “there is nothing wrong with being open about your emotions. In fact, it is harmful to yourself and others to hide them.” This statement also shows an element of Scott’s statement of fierceness of being “real” and authentic in conversations. This group’s project was very interesting and their analyses of relief, confusion, empathy, and frustration, in terms of John Gottman’s article “Putting Feelings into Words.” Throughout their examples of these emotions the team members showed many examples of real, “fierce” conversations.
In my post ”The Fiercest Classmates…” I said “The article definitely seems to have provided these classmates with a powerful new tool in their newfound “ferocity” as well as the ability to think critically about the effectiveness of their “exhalations.’” This ties into the notion of expressing emotions and in general the team’s ability to recognize these examples of emotions and define them. In a sense, they are being fierce in expressing their ideas about fellow classmates. Memphisburns says “If we do not remain attentive to our peers’ emotions and utilize them when formulating responses, or ‘nexting’, we stand to be stuck in a eternal “limbo” of apprehension and never move into an environment of relief and productivity.” Here they are again showing how being real, expressing authentic emotion, being fierce, can lead to “relief and productivity.”
In Jaggerbunny’s piece on frustration they describe another classmate’s use of fierce conversation: “This confusion would have caused her to sit back while the hostility continued, instead of allowing her to fix it. Her expression and understanding of her own frustration ended up being beneficial to the entire group.” In Group One’s presentation, “Who really defines who we are?: The manifestations of tensionality,” there are also examples of Scott’s idea of fierce conversation. They describe Johnnie Drama’s progress through this class and analyze the changes in communicative roles and identities. They say “Most of the time he would revolve some idea of his around a particular quotation by an author of an article or by a student. Up until now, he has been beating around the bush and avoided coming right out and saying what he wants. Up until now…” This again touches on Scott’s notion of being “real” and making conversations fierce. Their analyses are very objective and fierce in a way, as is Johnnie’s newfound way of “coming right out and saying what he wants.”
In Group One’s introduction Delivermesummer says “Through allowing tensionality to happen we are eliminate confusion and thus eliminating conflict.” The arguments that they present on the various tensions created by different roles relate to Jaggerbunny’s group’s ideas on expressing emotion and naming feelings. The tensions created by the different communicative roles require fierceness to maintain a real and authentic conversation where we express ourselves effectively and productively. Scott says “you are required to be responsive to your world.” (53) I think both of these group presentations show examples of Scott’s ideas and they both encourage being real and fierce in expressing and naming one’s emotions, as well as allowing tensionality and dialogue to happen.
August 19, 2008 at 1:42 am
I chose to critique team 5 as well as the presentation of team 4. Team 5 chose identification and expression of emotions for their topic and team 4 chose self disclosure as their topic. I am relating both of these presentations to Susan Scotts Fierce Conversations. Examples of “fierceness” in these presentations is there and it begins with Team 4 explaining that a good way to bolster a relationship with others is to express yourself to the others first. Y doing this you are nexting in order to spurn some sort of expression from the other party. In the terms of teams this is very true because, “joint action to achieve mutual goals can not be effective unless collaborators are quite open in their interactions with each other.” (Stewart 8th Ed., p234) How we open up to each other also shapes our identities to each other and we all want to project the best self possible, especially when working within a group. “We negotiate our identity by framing our words according to what we believe Steph wants from us. In addition, due to the classroom setting, and our work being posted for all to see, we negotiate to avoid judgment from classmates…” (Team 4) Team 4 also wrote how one of their team members would bring out her concern regarding the project and the end result was that the team kicked into gear and started addressing those expressed concerns. That expression of concern is fierce because it illicit a response from the group. The team member expressing the concerns is surely joined in those concerns by their group, just nobody said anything about it. The team used a good example from the Group Dynamics class where AP1115 was thinking about the reason that student were kept “in the dark” about what the final project would be about. AP1115 goes on to say that this darkness created confusion and as a result it made each individual rely on everyone else to figure it out. In this instance people had to respond fiercely in order for success as a whole by relying on each others’ ideas. Mass agreement would not work in the Group Dynamics class because nobody knew for sure what to do. They all had to respond fiercely to understand what was being asked by the professor. A lack of fierceness during that time in the class would have resulted in everyone doing the wrong thing.
Team 5 had examples of fierceness throughout the presentation. They chose expression of emotions as their topic and it could not have worked out better. Expressing ones emotions is being “fierce” because it is not the same with everyone because everyone has different emotions as well as different methods of expressing those emotions. Questioning and not just accepting is “fierce” and my questioning whatever the issue at hand is you most likely are helping someone else answer the same question you had. The team used examples from class that were mostly identification of emotions that later lead to clarification of confusion. “By others identifying their emotions, in this case, confusion, it seemed to have alleviated our anxiety as to whether or not it was ok for us to be confused, which was certainly a plus.” This expression of emotion clearly clarified the confusion that the group was having at the time and it was a “fierce” conversation because it expressed those emotions and illicit a response that helped the group in the end. Another good example from the presentation was from our interaction with Look Me in the Eye by John Elder Robison. “Not only did people express empathy with the author of the book, but also expressed it among their classmates. For example, Chelsea discussed how she can relate to Gym411 because “like him, I would be more likely to do the extra work and say nothing, rather than confront my group members.” Confronting the group members would be an example of “fierceness” but this person personally finds it easier to just be quiet than be “fierce” and find the answer from the other group members. The big idea here is that in classes such as the ones we have examined (Group Dynamics and IPC) too many students will not say anything when a problem arises to them They think they are the only ones and are alone in the quest to understand what is going on when in reality there may be three or four others in the same situation. The last example from the presentation is from when we all had trouble with the discussion threads in the beginning of our class when Steph began taking points off for posting in the wrong places. “Because Steph displayed her frustration, and began to penalize us for our errors, we learned to use the discussion tool properly. If Steph had continued to prod us gently, it would have taken longer for us to learn the system, and her frustration would have continued.” In this example Steph “nexted fiercely” in order to clarify her point so we would use the discussion properly and it worked! They really did well in showing how responding to a situation “fiercely” can really be for the good of the group when trying to problem solve.
Team 4 Presentation
Team 5 Presentation
My Own Weblog Post
August 19, 2008 at 2:05 am
Human emotion can be a funny thing, and so unpredictable. Your project hits home with a lot of people because emotion is something that we cannot ignore or shut out. You had very specific and colorful examples, and it was a very easy report to read.
When I read Stewart before, it seemed to me that he was talking about not fitting people into stereotypes, roles or cultural representations. I took this to mean that he wanted people to look at individuals, and not lump them together with others because of how they look, act or speak.
In Team Three’s project, there is a description of a slight conflict between two individuals. I chose the word individuals on purpose, because this conflict was brought about because one teammate lumped certain work ethics together with others and was just expressing his concern that two different types of work ethics wouldn’t fit well together in a team setting. This almost alienated a teammate because someone viewed them as a potential slacker. The “slacker” probably doesn’t slack at all, but due to certain circumstances, might not be able to turn in their homework until close to the deadline (it is a class during the summer, a busy time for most!), but this was viewed as an unmotivated person. I’m one of the people who turns in their assignments close to the deadline, not because I’m lazy (well a little bit), but because I work nights and my schedule is different from everyone else’s. I can see why the “slacker” was offended, because he was lumped into a negative group without being looked at as an individual.
In Masr’s Team’s project, there is a discussion of an “attack reaction”, it states that “group members react and will generally attack the designated leadership (facilitators), as well as any emerging leaders within the group.” People would be attacked because students would become frustrated with a new topic, and lash out at the people in charge because they felt wronged by them. Whether the attack was towards Steph or any of their peers, it was brewed from frustration, and the target became the leaders because people may have felt that they owed them more information.
August 19, 2008 at 2:11 am
When selecting my two presentations, I picked two that I thought would conjoin nicely together. I picked Group 5’s project – about naming feelings – and Group 3’s project – about the consequentiality of emotions. After reading the two articles I notcied that the general ideas that were trying to be portrayed were different, but the context and meaning behind all of the examples were exactly the same – so much so that these two presentation could be combined and create the perfect storm of emotionality.
Team 5 decided to focus on how “it is necessary to verbalize feelings in order to harness them.” They go on to say that “identifying emotions is crucial to the facilitation and progression of communication.” So what they are basically saying is that by knowing what you are feeling, you can more easily express that feeling. Well, yes, that makes perfect sense. Moreover, by you being able to adequately identify your own emotions, and more easily put said emotions into words, then it makes it easier for others to “next” you based on said emotions. Simple enough…
Team 3’s take on emotions went the way of consequentiality. Their basic idea was structured around how “our individual emotional response to a situation, has an impact on the communication process.” Yet again, this is all making sense. By someone expressing emotion to another in a communicative manner, the receiver of said emotion will respond accordingly. These ideas are pretty simple to grasp. But do you see what I’m saying about how these two could be combined?
Team 3 brings up the topic of how “what we anticipate, how we approach the situation accordingly, profoundly effects how we communicate.” So if you are going to anticipate a certain response from another, technically you can anticipate the emotion that you are subsequently going to feel. Furthermore, if you know how you are going to feel, then it will make it a whole lot easier to re-communicate your emotions and create a more fluid conversation, according to the argument presented by Team 5.
I truly believe that these two teams – at least the topics – should be meshed to create a more cohesive and complete presentation: “Knowing what you feel leads to better consequences.” Perhaps we could add some more fierceness to these groups as well. When I was reading these presentations I didn’t feel any emotion going into the writing. It was as if the authors were just going through the motions just like any other written assignment for a mid-year examination. Now this perhaps might be caused by my relatively higher level of “fierceness.” (See my point about OuterBodyBoi) So accordingly all other writing would appear to be less fierce. I am not saying that it was bad writing – on the contrary, the writing was done very well and precise. But I just didn’t feel stirred by what I was reading.
August 19, 2008 at 2:42 pm
The Coordinated Management of Meaning best explains the communication between classmates. We have various interpretations and meanings that we take from readings. The rules of the situation we are interacting in govern how we express them though. Commsyr09 expressed how empathy was a very important emotion to her, “…empathy allows us to connect with those whom we communicate with on a deeper more intimate level.” I feel she would never have disclosed that information at the beginning of the class. The rules that govern which thought is inappropriate and which is proper to communicate constantly evolve. The meaning you take from a selection will evolve as the setting around the communication does. I would venture to say Commsyr09 may not have even selected empathy to focus on from our project had she not undergone the rigors of the entire class prior to that. The management of meaning is dynamic and constantly shifts to provide a framework for communication. Every life experience you endure changes the meaning of the world around you, and every act of interpersonal communication you engage in shifts or reconfirms your handle on the process.
August 20, 2008 at 4:03 pm
I think the theory that most relates to our group’s project, as well as the comments to the project, is the ethnography of communication. As a class, each one of has learned the same (for the most part) ideas of communication, and it shows in the way we respond to each other. For example, our project focuses on the way emotions have been shown by ourselves, our instructor, and our classmates. This is something that relates to everyone in the class, and that is why we chose it. We are all college students, with an interest in the same topic, presumably living in the United States, and we share a group code of communication. Commsyr says in his comment “It seems as though once anger is added into the equation, communication is hindered. How do we avoid this emotion?” By phrasing his thought as a question to the entire class, it seems that he is trying to communicate by making us all try to find an answer Sports08 used the word “interlocuters,” a term most of learned for the first time in this class. Grant2u finds a way to link
to the entire group experience of the class, instead of his individual experience, saying “I feel that Bohm in his words holds the essence of what a lot of us experienced in this class” President Makalele compares our class’s concerns to those of the other class. This shows that he thinks of our class as its own separate group. JohnnieDrama mentioned that he thought our team’s project could be meshed together with Team 3′s project. This desire to consolidate groups also an inclination toward a group mentality. JimiGarcia gives a perfect example of ethnography of communication. He says
“To me this shows that Memphis realized they are writing their response to people who are in this class and can understand this vocabulary.” Everyone in this class is writing in order to make others understand. We are communicating in a way that is dependent on a group, not on ourselves as individuals.